The Normies, The Intelligentsia, The Elites

Humans are created beings. As created beings our lives should always and only serve our Divine Creator. We are fools when our lives serve other created entities (OCEs).

Everyone is a type of fool, which is OK so long as we recognize which type of fool we are and amend our foolishness accordingly. (This takes longer than anyone expects, so the sooner we recognize and acknowledge our foolishness, the better.)

Though flawed and foolish human beings, our aim should be to live as honestly as possible, which means admitting our hatred, our greed, our lust, our gluttony, our pride etc. This is hard, but this guide makes it slightly easier politically. (Admittedly the least important way to amend ourselves, but a good start.)

I do not claim to know the intimacy of an individual’s heart; only our Divine Creator has that ability. However, I do know the ingredient that makes a political opinion a bad one—lies. Professing lies as truths--however innocently ignorant or willfully mislead--always leads to living dishonestly and unwittingly serving OCEs.

Since it is still fashionable to have a loud and retarded political opinion via social media, it is easier for yours truly to identify when political lies have been believed, and easier to create said categories. But: because politics runs downstream our culture of death at large, retarded political opinions are just the tip of the shaft of lies that we are screwing ourselves with.

There are three basic categories of political fools that form the hierarchy of our culture of death: The Normies, The Intelligentsia and The Elites.

The Normies

For the most part normies are intrinsically good and rightfully believe in human dignity. Depending on their personality type (among other factors), normies fall somewhere between useful idiot and prole, aggressively leftist or complacent liberal.

Normies are not necessarily basic people—I know many extraordinary normies: PhDs, doctors, lawyers, raconteurs, people with strange interests, tastes and personalities—they just have basic political taste, a result of their political media consumption/education. I can be fascinated by a person, only to be disappointed when they disparage Trump as a ‘racist.’

Like all minds everywhere and for all times, normie minds are malleable, massaged into intellectual submission with a constant flow of propaganda into their brains via social media notifications and earbud implants. They thusly believe themselves to be constantly informed. However, the more propaganda they consume the more they cannot discern between fact and opinion. Normies are not skeptical when they consume propaganda because they have put naïve faith in its “objectivity.” They trust these OCEs, who only spew lies to unmask the normies' latent hatred towards injustice, aiming it towards concocted scapegoats like ‘systemic racism’ and ‘white supremacy.’ 

Their political viewpoint becomes a hackneyed repetition of the mainstream narrative with zero nuance. Normies cannot think outside this narrative because they are not aware of alternative  sources, or so offended by the existence of said sources that they are unwilling to give them credibility by giving them viewership, conditioned to believe that any other opinion outside "official" sources are solely based on ‘hatred’ and ‘bigotry.’

Examples: They gullibly believe that ‘Black Lives Matter’ means what the group’s name suggests, ignoring pervasive violence in black neighborhoods by black residents; they might not like abortion but still “respect a woman’s right to choose;” they think that Joe Biden was elected legitimately in an election that was “the most secure in history” according to the mainstream press; they think that diversity is our greatest strength at the same time believing racism is our biggest problem.

The normie worldview requires little scrutiny to fall apart, but they are incapable of scrutinizing it themselves. Not because they are stupid, but because they are kept ignorant by a matrix created to trap them intellectually. Depending on the normie’s personality and commitment to their ignorance, this is an impenetrable forcefield. The more far gone the normie the more they “answer” prodding questions to their beliefs with distractions, insults or lies.

Normies unwittingly serve The Elites. Who can blame them? They are busy creatures, with only a passing interest in political warfare because they think that, as Americans, they are supposed to have political opinions. While they have the right to have an idiotic opinion so distilled from reality that it is completely meaningless, they do not have to hold an idiotic opinion so distilled from reality that it is completely meaningless.

This normie label is meant to be taken personally; it is meant to be a political slur. I love normies, but not for their idiocy. I want them to stop being normies altogether, in the very least admit when they do not know something--or anything. This way they can rise above this expendable NPC meme that they have become. (Humans are so much more than their stupid political opinions.) My wish is for normies to say something honest like, ‘That’s a good point, I never thought about it that way before.’ Charitable, the way I used to be before the election was stolen from Trump and I started calling everyone a bitch.

The Intelligentsia

There are two types of Intelligentsia in our modern media-saturated age: Legacy and Millennial.

Legacy Intelligentsia (LI) include such honorable and trusted names like CNN, The NY Times, NPR, Democracy Now! and The View for some reason. Millennial Intelligentsia (MI) are only common folk who use their social media accounts to remind the other normies of the importance of wearing masks in between recipe posts.

LI have friends in high places and admittedly, a gift for exquisitely mincing words and coining the terms of today’s newspeak. The MI that are the first ones to use the said terms in their facebook posts are on the “cutting edge.” This tactic also normalizes the narrative. After all, if “normal people” agree with the government on all things controversial, then the government must be inerrant.

Both normie audiences believe the various lies of The Intelligentsia because they are “official,” and normies cannot believe that any “official” publication would have any reason to lie (this trait is common for all normies).

LI have deceived themselves for the sake of their—you guessed it! —ideology, and the MI have been so indoctrinated from their university upbringing while drowning in news propaganda that they forgot that they were Anti-War in 2008, spending four years deranged over the most Anti-War President in recent history.

LI believes that they are reporting the truth--in the very least “their truth”—while the MI regurgitates said “their truth.” (Meanwhile no other truth is permitted.)

The LI are the monetary beneficiaries of Connections with Skin in the Game, having none themselves. This hardly matters. So long as they are granted a little bit of money to mold minds, and their publication is kept afloat by a billionaire and their special interests, selling their integrity for the sake of the admiration of ignorant masses is totally worth it.

The MI are the most pathetic losers of the elitist Agenda; they don’t even get paid! Unless you count ‘likes’ and the self-satisfaction of saving the world by reminding the other normies how many lives we have saved by wearing masks.

The Elites

The Elites know that it is impossible to control all the minds all the time. Some people will be reformed normies….reformies? (as a type of Intelligentsia, I need to think of a better term for non-normies), while others will be controlled by competing propaganda from other groups of elites. Another surreptitious way for elites to control normies is with profligate abundance.

The Normies and The Intelligentsia confuse purchasing power with legitimate power. They foolishly think they have power because they are financially empowered: confident enough to buy stuff that makes them physically comfortable, and then more stuff when that comfort gets boring. But this is not power; this is slavery. The Elites know this and exploit it. (This is what makes them Elites.)

Money asks, power tells.

Power tells us where and what to spend our money on; it dictates how we spend our time; it tells us which candidate to support and why; it tells us who to hate, and how best to hate them. The Elites deceive and exploit normies for worldly gain.

As a person content with the bare minimum, I pondered aloud, what motivates someone to deceive and exploit and control other people like pawns? It’s so much effort! And how much power does someone really need?

A disembodied voice reminded me that every ego is insatiable in its own way. It can become a bottomless pit when fully indulged, and it can swallow us up if we let it. Some people want to get swallowed up for the illusion of worldly power. They must be careful. The only OCE that promises to quench our insatiable ego with worldly power is The Evil One.

Normies and Intelligentsia are mere pawns in this hidden game of World Domination played by various warring groups of The Elites. Greedy and proud elites are distracted by The Evil One’s promises and have seemingly forgotten our collective inevitability: death. Death is not the end. Death is the beginning. And with this beginning comes true justice, true consequences for a life lived in accordance with OCEs, and not our Divine Creator.

There is always an OCE fighting for control of our lives, but we must remember that our lives only belong to Our Creator and live according to His will. 

Who are you serving?

Abortion Is Worse Than Coronavirus

In the same instant that I learned the gruesome reality of abortion, I became apologetically Pro-Life. I never called myself Pro-Life, and I never brought the subject up; if the topic were broached, I was silent, fearful of any damage my “opinion” would do to my “reputation.” I felt isolated, and hiding from the truth was living a lie. 

Then in 2017, there was an anti-abortion protest in Washington D.C. called The March for Life. Its attendance numbered in the hundreds of thousands. Suddenly, I did not feel so alone. There were courageous people that felt the same way I did, their “reputations” be damned. They were unapologetically Pro-Life, and, inspired by their example, I could be too.

This March for Life occurred annually, every January on or around the anniversary of the passing of Roe v. Wade. But why had I never heard of the March for Life? I knew about the Earth Day March, and I’d learned about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr’s march on Washington in the 60s. I’d seen coverage of the Women’s March that same weekend….and then it dawned on me.

The March for Life was only covered in the news in comparison to the Women’s March, and not the other way around. The Women’s March--the pitiful anti-Trump hate rally of low information voters displeased with the results of the 2016 election--was why the mainstream press covered the March for Life at all!

Had there been no Women’s March would the media have covered the March for Life?

Good question.

 
Will the media cover the March for Life in the second year of the P A N D E M I C, 2021?

Unfortunately, we will not get an answer to this good question because the March for Life has cancelled itself this year. Who can be surprised? The CCP (Chinese Communist Party) Virus government response to Covid has ruined everything Americans cherished, from Easter 2020 to the Thanksgiving Day Parade to the 2020 general election.

For the first time in its nearly 50-year history there is not going to be a March for Life. This is both a blow to the relevance of the Pro-Life movement, and a missed opportunity for the March for Life organizers.

The orthodoxy of the P A N D E M I C, namely that Nothing Is Worse Than Spreading the Virus, is now admitted by the March for Life, the largest anti-abortion event in the world. This is false; abortion is much worse than a flu with a 99% survival rate. The organizers know this but have cowered to this pathetic public opinion.

Everyone knows that spread of the coronavirus is prevented by washing hands, standing 6 ft apart OR wearing masks.  Reminders of these facts are e v e r y w h e r e ! (Retardation is not even an excuse anymore.) Therefore, the March for Life could impose feasible restrictions on attendance, knowing that those more prone to catching the virus can--and will--stay home, as ordered since last March. 

Furthermore, the Capitol riot has been subdued, the President impeached (again).....a historically peaceful march on Washington is far from the violence seen at media approved BLM and Antifa protests in cities all around the country this summer. 

In our culture of death, legal abortion can only be prevented with the changing of hearts and minds--the purpose of the March for Life. Without it, abortion becomes another “necessary evil,” or worse, the last possible form of birth control.

And the only thing worse than whimsically murdering unborn children is a generation of idiots that call it a “women’s right.” What’s at risk is empowering these retards to brainwash the next generation into thinking that abortion is a settled issue.

Abortion may be legal, but it is far from settled. Life is still precious here as evidenced by the grassroots Pro-Life movement. We do not live in China (or Canada).

Even with God on our side, being a Pro-Life activist requires a pre-requisite of courage; why should battle-hardened activists care what the Fake News Media and some retarded ideologues think or say? Why should they be afraid of weak ass lies? (The answer is in a future column.)

This was the perfect opportunity to get America's attention, reminding them that while coronavirus sucks, abortion is so much worse. This is a war; we do not need another gay virtual event for the biggest human rights violation of our time. 

Losing the most Pro-Life President in our history in the same month as the cancelled March for Life--however much gagged by the mainstream media-- has been a real test for the faithful in a year so young. 

Insights of Lived Boredom

As a casual experiment for no pre-determined length of time, I decided to live without the internet last winter.

By evening of the first day, I was using again.

Back then, the only way for me to succeed was to compromise. As such, I decided to avoid all social media instead, while still using the greater internet for necessities like news, blogs, debates, gossip, and calumny. (There were always arguments to be had in the comments section of news sites.) But without twitter to scroll through while I stood in an elevator for 13 seconds, my phone became semi-useless. Rarely did I receive phone calls or text messages, and Gmail and Venmo were hardly as satisfying.

This new lifestyle choice was cut short by the P A N D E M I C and resulting quarantine, which fettered me comfortably to a computer screen to use the internet the way we did circa 2002.

This experiment, and others that followed, made undeniable that I was a slave to the internet and social media. More than a habit, this was now my *sigh*……lifestyle. I needed to take a cold shower forever.

There were two reasons why I had become a slave: I was afraid to appear alone in groups of people, and submitted to my phone to look busy (important), and I was afraid of boredom (thinking independently) i.e. using my hard earned intuition. (This was not Absolute Boredom, a different topic.) Thus, the phone enabled the slow and habitual creep of spiritual weakness. I did not rely on God for these moments of boredom, but my digital appendage.

Alas, this was only a temporary public persona I’d adopted anyway. Once quarantined my internet addiction served as much a crutch for boredom and God replacement as my phone had before the experiment.

No longer. Today is Day 12 or 13 (I forget) of extremely limited internet and no social media. It has not been easy, and I find myself often bored. My phone is nothing more than a sleek and smooth brick, yet it must always accompany me. (I am beginning to wonder why.) Of course, I can still enjoy media that ends, like books and newspapers, just not video games, TV, movies or videos. The idea for this experiment is ascetic in nature. What will avoiding the instant gratification via phone and the information deluge of the internet at large do to me?

The First Stage is Boredom

My intellect is average at best, but boredom has undeniably increased it; I have recently compiled a list of daily insights (expect to see them fleshed out here). That was not possible when I was always being told what to think and when to think it, conditioned by my phone’s notifications to care about what was outside my control.

Newly ignorant to current events, I trust whatever I overhear, and because I don’t have any “alternative” facts, I can’t rebut. Boredom is the perfect exchange for fear and anger. This is very freeing!

The news is bullshit anyway. (So is voting.) All I need to know is which liberties they are taking away and when and/or which country we are invading and “why.” Simplifying my life by giving up control has thus far made me very content. I will always have political opinions that surface, but they will burn away if not fueled by the news cycle. Good. This leaves room for glorifying God, the only thing that separates us from the animals in the first place.

Everyone is always outraged by something, somewhere. Not me. I’m bored!

The Second Stage is Prayer

Silence is precious. Boredom is the first immature expression of that silence. I am immature insofar as silence is new to me. When it becomes unbearable, I rage and complain.

This is because I am a spoiled bitch. (Ordinary people accepted constant boredom for millennia before our pathetic generation.) However, once I let that rage and those complaints pass over me--without giving in to the temptation of twitter—I become calm. I stop trying to control everything and begin to enjoy this unpleasantness as it passes. This takes time and patience, of which I am also a novice and can give no practical tips.

When I am emptied of boredom, I am in silence. When I am in silence God is close. To bring myself closer, I pray.

Are there more than two stages?

I don’t know yet. Probably?

Arriving at the first step was the result of desperation for change, manifested from a deeper sadness that “entertainment” could never fill. Courageously taking that step was done in rebellion to fear and its control over me, which was only possible because I have faith (Stage 2). (How to have faith is another topic.)

The buffet of distraction has replaced ordinary boredom, in turn causing everyone to become addicted to entertainment. By denying myself this temptation and forcing myself to pay attention to my surroundings, I am re-learning to use my brain for glorifying God.

Are you ready to be uncomfortable? Are you ready to be free? God is waiting.

The Year of Persuasive Insults

For a long while I will be thinking about the events of last week, and its psychological impact on our nation, starting with me. (Expect to read them here.) While the political outcome, personally disagreeable, has been “resolved,” there is nothing more I could have done to change the outcome other than “vote.” It is what it is, but my imagination is restless…

Biases aside, once power returned to the new Old Guard, persuasion officially died. Literally: Big Tech cracked down on “conservative” voices, scattering them among the greater internet and across smaller, unknown social media platforms. There is no one left to persuade because the opposition is no longer allowed access to an alternative viewpoint. With no access to challenging or disagreeable viewpoints, this ancient intellectual sport will no longer be played. Why does the left need to play anyway? They’ve “won” the jackpot! They own everything! They don’t have to ignore what doesn’t exist.

Revelations, however, cannot be censored or ignored. A friend posted a quote from Mitt Romney and I thought, ‘but Mitt Romney is a bitch.’ Someone else wrote a post describing some politician’s “achievements” so obsequiously flattering, that to prevent myself vomiting from The Cringe I knee jerk labelled him ‘a bitch;’ its immediate relief was like taking a Midol. On my way home a homeless woman on the subway called the male officer attempting to escort her to safety ‘a bitch.’ Three times the charm; this was a supernatural message.

‘A bitch’ is the new ‘persuasive’ insult of 2021. (‘A bitch’ is more potent: just one of many similar bitches.) Leftists have been bitches for years, too touchy to play the argument game (because they always lose). So, now that they will be empowered by power and ‘punching down’ for the next four years--maintaining their privilege of making bad arguments but still being rewarded—I will be responding in the only language they speak: insults.

Faggot, a bitch, and gay are all entering my public lexicon. For spite’s sake, but also because I’ve missed using these classic schoolyard insults. They may not have been heard since middle school, but they still sting in the heat of the moment.

For the record, I was always willing to have a cautious discussion when we had political power, and I was even willing to lose with grace. Leftists and normies will not reciprocate that grace. At this point, it’s easier, and just more fun (and satisfying) to punch below the belt and call someone a bitch. Call me a 'white supremacist.' At least I'm not a fucking faggot. (If I speak their language they might listen.)

Our world changes drastically every year now. I’m joyful to see what God has in store for us in 2022.

Reading Books Again

I was reading a book the other day and came across the word cunt.

Cunt is one of those offensive and obscene words that we are not allowed to say and not allowed to hear, but are still allowed to write and read. (For now.) This is one reason why books are awesome.

It had been a long time since I’d thought about this word because I have not been reading books lately. I don’t hear cunt on the news, or on TV (I don’t watch British TV), or on the radio, or podcasts or whatever media I was consuming for the past however many sad months since I’d last seen the word cunt on the printed page. I didn’t realize how much I’d missed reading books until I read it.

Cunt doesn’t have to be in every book either. It shouldn’t be. And it’s not in most books I read. It’s not in 98% of books I read. It’s better that way. I appreciate cunt more now than ever before. So much so that I devote an entire blog to how hard this word hits. Reading cunt is like watching a boxer get KO’d. Or breaking a freshly baked cookie. Or watching a cyst get drained (if you’re into that sort of thing). You get what I’m saying.

I generally agree with laws against lewdness and obscenity in the media. But books should always be exempt for the following reasons:

1) Books require effort to read.
Nowadays, more and more people don’t want to put forth that effort. Don’t penalize the readers who do put forth that effort by taking away a powerful and awesome word.

2) Censoring words is pointless.

A sentence does not need to use the word cunt to be explicit. Cunt is simply an artistic choice used for emphasis. It’s like an exclamation point. It would be more productive to censor ideas. (Please don't do this Big Tech.)

3) The word cunt would be buried in the text.

An impressionable young kid would never find cunt simply by flipping through the work in question. They’d be better off reading the entire book to find the dirty word, in which case the ideas would make an impression before the standalone word did.
No one reads books anymore anyway. When I spy on people using their phones on the subway they are on Facebook, YouTube, WhatsApp or Candy Crush. You won’t see cunt on those platforms.

That’s not a sad fact. Readers don’t want cunt diluted pervasively. It’s our word. Let’s leave cunt in the books, where its impact is great and its reach only available to those most dedicated.

Opinions Can Be Wrong

Early one morning in the summer of 2007 I had a lengthy disagreement with some friends regarding my statement 'opinions can be wrong.'

For my friends, this statement was nonsensical. Opinions couldn't be wrong because they were not facts. Facts were true, but only because they underwent a lengthy disputation before they were considered ‘right’ or ‘wrong.’ On the other hand, opinions were judgments that did not have to be based on facts. (Back then I was known for having opinions based on whims, making this discussion difficult to be taken seriously.) Therefore, applying the standards of facts to opinions was unfair to opinions. (This could also have been an opinion that was wrong.)

My main argument was an appeal to authority: an individual that neither reads nor writes might have a low opinion of a book considered a classic by the experts, in which case their opinion would be ‘wrong’ because it is based on whimsical subjectivity and not the objective knowledge known by the experts.

My friends were unconvinced. They claimed that the same parameters could not be applied to art. The beauty of art was subjective. A classic book that did not appeal to an unread individual could be considered ‘bad’ by that “reader” because that unread individual was not the proper audience and did not have the proper knowledge to appreciate it. Likewise, an Ivy League educated book snob would not appreciate even a classic work of ghetto fiction because they are not the proper audience. There is no 'right' or 'wrong' in art because context is everything.

However, writing technique is objective because it is based on objective rules of language. Every artistic medium is based on objective, definitive techniques. When an artist masters these techniques they begin the process of creation that is then judged by the eyes of the beholders, some of which have expert knowledge in areas unknown to a casual observer. Therefore, the more an individual knows, the more weight their opinion holds. Experts cannot force appreciation, but they can inspire it.

The closer a work of art arrives at the truth, the more beautiful it is. This nuance is lost on the philistine making their opinion worth less than the expert's. Not all opinions are equal. That is ok. That is a beautiful truth in itself.

On and on we argued, arriving at an impasse when the sun started to rise.

The debate I had with my friends that morning was healthy and normal, but over the years the truth has not bridged that impasse. The truth has been replaced by the cancer of lies, in the institution where it matters most: education. The same authorities by which I appealed were now expert liars.
Having an ignorant opinion on a topic of interest is normal for any fledgling student. It is the first step of the education process.

The problem arises when there is no debate or further investigation into a topic of interest to form a more nuanced and expert opinion. When critical, dissident thinking is not promoted, when free thought is stifled, when the statement ‘men can get pregnant’ becomes a commandment, and only heretics ask the obvious ‘how?’ By tradition, naive students rightfully trust that their handsomely paid mentors are teaching them the truth, and not a disputed opinion. Nowadays—because they are naive—students marry the first opinions they are force fed in college.

Once married to an opinion, a young fool will be very reluctant to divorce it. Instead, they will defend this idea, which further justifies their love for it. As they grow closer to it, they ignore all the facts that dispute it as “baseless.” This thought pattern is a disservice to critical thinking, and follows a young student through all the decisions they make throughout their lives.

Debating the truth is an ancient rite of passage. In societies of humble and self reflective individuals, the truth, when admitted, sets us free. That is becoming impossible in this society because the truth is taught to be relative. This creates a generation of people who do not have faith in God and do not know how to have faith in God. Rather, they have faith in the lies peddled by powerful authorities with weak opinions. They have replaced God with a political/media authority.

The more we are thoughtfully prodded, the more the truth makes itself known to us. (There will still be disagreements and disputing opinions based on facts, what we want is to eliminate the disputes on fundamentals.) But this is a spiritual battle; the more we don’t question the lies, the more they spread like a virus.

This endeavor is a process. It never occurs instantaneously, if at all. Nowadays, humility is lacking because authorities providing the lies package it with pride and condescension. Knowledge is always hard earned, through life lessons or research. (Nobody wants to do the hard work, they just want to have an opinion to condescend to others.) But if opinions cannot be wrong, then what is the point of having one? What is the point of discussion if there is no truth to arrive at? Pride, ego, self-satisfaction etc

Everything I write and think about is inherently human in nature, and therefore cannot be rectified simply by calling attention to it. The mature human thing to do is discern when to have courageous discussion between disagreeing parties, and then be courageous and have those discussions. Otherwise we give our minds away to the current authoritarians that have furtively gained control over truth.

We are like boiling frogs. The only reason we believe lies is because it is temporarily comfortable...and then we are dead.

Kill Antifa

Killing is wrong. Especially killing the handicapped. We shouldn't do that. 

We especially shouldn't kill the mentally handicapped simply because they are mentally handicapped. On those grounds I am obviously morally opposed to killing Antifa.

Don't get me wrong: Antifa should still be killed. Just not all Antifa, and not all the time. (Certainly not just for being Antifa.) As civilized Americans, we would be just as hypocritically evil if we allowed the army to execute Antifa publicly. It would be sad and disgusting, and worst of all, Antifa would be right.

But Antifa is not right, and Antifa will never be right, and this is because God exists and America is a Christian nation, and therefore nobody can be persecuted by the American government for holding a political point of view. 

If Trump really wanted to kill Antifa, all Antifa would be have been dead on Trump's First Inauguration Day. Trump has the power to kill Antifa, but doesn't. It is the Constitution itself (and our rights enshrined therein) that is stopping Trump from being "Hitler." By protesting America, Antifa is idiotically protesting their own right to exist!

Antifa doesn't believe in God, but they do believe in rights. They demand protection of their rights by a compliant and cooperative American "regime," meanwhile violating the rights of others protesting peacefully. And because America is so charitable, Antifa can protest like the violent lunatics they are and receive no just treatment for violating the law and rights of others. 

As citizens, this is why we must kill Antifa. We must protect ourselves from violent lunatics whose protests are an idiotic lie and justification for hurting others with different political beliefs. When Antifa attacks with their knives and brass knuckles and Molotov cocktails, we shoot them in the face. 

But killing Antifa is the last possible option.  

First, we must humiliate Antifa. Antifa are empowered by the media and their college professors to speak their mind. When they do, we must humiliate them and their stupid fucking ideas. Somewhere along the way they believed lies, and the evil liars enabled them to take on some kind of existential battle against "racism" and "white supremacy." Therefore, we must make them cry for their own good. It's ok to cry. Definitely not gay.

If they won't cry now, then they will be killed later.

Tragic Decay

Most of us won’t die instantly in an explosion of blood or a hail of gunfire. Most of us will decay. Most of us are already decaying. Most of us have been decaying for years.

We neither see nor expect explosions; exploding in blood is unexpected and sudden, and therefore tragic.

Like a beloved series that gets cancelled too soon versus a series that jumps the shark. The former is tragic because it was never given the opportunity to flourish. The latter is sad because it has outlived its potential.

There is more time to make necessary observations through decay than through explosion. Living a long life to its natural end is a beautiful blessing. Decay is the natural transformative process of beautiful life into timely death. Though potentially painful, decay is very much preferable to instantly exploding in blood because it allows for valuable introspection in a way exploding in blood cannot.

While decaying with retrospect we can become sad. Sadness is as natural—and contingent—as joy. It is normal to be sad when something concludes because it is joyful when something we like is happening. To earn joy we need to suffer through the sadness. This is a worthy trade-off; we can appreciate the joy more.

We can also appreciate our shelf life through the sadness of decay. It gives us the privilege of ample time to observe transformation and make necessary changes in our life (before it naturally ends). Decay illuminates our heart and mind to Truth, pinpointing the moments of joy and sadness on our inevitable march to death.

I know I said that decay is not tragic, but it is not never tragic. There are two exceptions.

Detroit

Detroit is a tragedy I mistook as a joke. Once called the ‘Paris for the West,’ the Motor City was the fifth largest city in the country in 1950. Cadillac, Ford and General Motors were produced there, providing good union jobs to many of its inhabitants. In the 20s people traveled from all over the country to work in Detroit’s auto industry. The city grew exponentially until the Depression, and then became known as the ‘Arsenal of Democracy’ during World War II as its industry turned from producing cars to producing weaponry.

Today Detroit is an apocalyptic wasteland. Crime and corruption are rampant and the city has been steadily losing population, any city’s lifeblood. From 2000 to 2010, 250,000 people left the city. Where once the city’s population was above 2 million, today it is less than 800,000. Cities usually have an upward, if bumpy trajectory. After the riots in 1967, Detroit has had a downward trajectory.

Only images of Detroit's former architectural glory can imply the depravity of violence and poverty that the poor city has descended.

What makes Detroit tragic is how is has slowly decayed from its former glory. Cities don’t have lifespans and do not die like humans do. Cities can only change. When they get sick, their death is not inevitable and they do not die mercifully. They toil in the agony of their decay mercilessly. It is the responsibility of the population of said city to observe its sources of decay and make appropriate changes to hamper it, and then reverse it. Cities are kept alive by the population that inhabits them, and the glory of a city reflects the population of the city. Cities only die when the city has been emptied its lifeblood.

Constantinople did not die; it was transformed by Muslim conquest and became Istanbul. (A different kind of tragedy.) Likewise Detroit cannot die, just change depending on the culture of the population that inhabits it.

Detroit grew into glory, then slipped into depravity. It has changed for the worse. Its problems are amendable with hard work and dedication, the ingredients that contributed to Detroit’s rise. Cities do not have to toil in decay permanently; they can change back. Cities are unlike humans in that they are reversible tragedies. Even cities as dysfunctional as Detroit are not without hope.

The Human Detroit

Humans are different than cities because they decay before eventually dying. Most humans decay naturally, but Caitlyn Jenner, the human Detroit, is decaying tragically because she chose to decay unnaturally.

Caitlyn Jenner is a “female” television personality and retired Olympic gold medal-winning decathlete. Caitlyn Jenner is 71 years old, but has only been a “female” for five years. This is because Caitlyn Jenner was once a man named Bruce Jenner, the epitome of male athletic excellence. He was in excellent physical shape and great physical health even up to his transitory surgery from male to female in 2015, at age 66. This unnatural and cosmetic transition from male to female is tragic, like Detroit, because of the unnatural downward spiral of its permanent transformation. Unlike Detroit, which has an uphill battle to return to a shadow of its former self, Jenner’s transformation is a permanent one; once surgically removed, genitals cannot be surgically restored for natural function.

Bruce Jenner cannot be expected to remain the same glorious shape that won him the Olympic Gold medal as he decays in his old age, and no one expected this of him. So why was it necessary for him to physically alter his gender during the course of his natural decay? This is especially tragic—and ironic—for a man that was once an Olympic athlete, whose glorious athleticism was a marvel of human achievement! (This could be an Andy Kaufman style joke taken beyond humor. It is the kind of sick joke made sicker because it is real.) Bruce Jenner’s athleticism is rare, and it glory should be respected until natural death, not altered by a mentally ill whim. That makes Jenner’s gender reassignment surgery an especially heinous crime. There can be no greater insult to his former self and mankind, than what he has done to his body.

Would it have been more merciful for Detroit to be leveled with a bomb (if no humans were harmed) and Jenner to have randomly exploded in blood before giving in to “gender reassignment” than let them each become examples of tragic decay?

Or is there a lesson to be learned?

Trump Wins

(Well, my last post did not age well and a new darkness has settled on the nation! Optimism is new for me, but I will maintain that darkness only exists because light exists, therefore all darkness is temporary, even if it lasts the extent of my lifetime…)

On Day Four of The Election I walked down the street and heard celebratory honking. (If you live in traffic like I do, you know the difference between angry, joyous even jealous honking.) A large girl walking beside me banged a wooden spoon against a pot, like a child allowed to stay up to midnight on New Year's Eve.  

"What's going on?" I asked. 

“Biden won!” she exclaimed.

“Oh,” I responded. “Did Trump concede?” 

She did not reply but banged on the pot and continued walking in the direction of the honking. Banging a pot is preferable to thinking or being informed.

Who can blame her?

The Complicit Media

The media arm of the Deep State Democratic Party (The NY Times, CNN, even Fox News) has lied to the people and declared Biden President-Elect. The election is not yet certified. This wishful thinking is childish and irresponsible, nothing but a show for Biden and Harris and their “supporters.” The legacy media’s authority, just like the news they report, is make believe. 

Two movies play simultaneously, and in the recent past viewers were able to choose which one they wanted to see. Today, the legacy media, the Deep State and now Big Tech does not give Americans this choice. Thus, they deepen today’s ideological divide.

When the truth comes out---and it always does---people will have two responses: disbelief/humility/forgiveness, or, more likely, cognitive dissonant violence. The mainstream media will mainstream “legitimate” rage, much like they did this summer….

A Term I Hate

“Deep State.”

It sounds fictitiously conspiratorial, like a term from The X-Files. But that show was not based on complete falsehoods. Even Eisenhower warned of The Military Industrial Complex.

Normies and lefties are lead by the legacy media to believe that the Deep State does not exist, and that anyone who does is ‘crazy, right wing, neo-nazi’ blah, blah, blah.

Just because legacy media does not acknowledge the ‘Deep State’ or use the term does not mean it does not exist. Like Cosa Nostra, the Deep State is very real.

When Trump announced his bid for the presidency in 2015 he declared war on the Deep State and thus became “Hitler.”

Who was responsible for the “Russia Collusion” investigation? Deep State Democrats. Who spread the lie that there was credible evidence linking Trump to Russia? Deep State media. What did the courts find? Nothing.

Why? Because there was nothing to find, and the Deep State is not everywhere (yet).

We do not live in China (yet).

Our country was designed by the people, for the people; not by the elite, for the elite. There was a very good reason the founders drew it up this way: to prevent the creation of a Deep State. Trump's victory would have made our founders proud.

Last Time

After watching Trump single handedly take down the entire Republican establishment in 2016, the Democrats sensed that they could lose their party to Bernie, who would lose the election to Trump, so they took the nomination from Spineless Bernie who was either blackmailed, extorted or paid off. Hillary, the insider, took the Democratic nomination as planned.

Hillary condescendingly called Trump supporters ‘deplorables’ in a Mask Off moment--the Deep State is still human—and Trump was elected instead. This was back when elections still had integrity because Trump’s adversaries underestimated his appeal.

This Time

The Deep State Democrats did not underestimate Trump's support in 2020, but their candidates were lacking in everything but name recognition. Due to the pandemic and the riots and Biden's lack of charisma, the 2020 campaign trail was meek when compared to 2016, and there was little fanfare until the debates. This was because everyone knew Trump was going to win handily; barring any legitimate scandals, incumbents tend to win. (And Trump won mathematically on election night.) 

So, like the primaries in 2016, they rigged the 2020 general election, with good reason: to prevent Hitler's 2nd term. However much power and control they think they had, they again underestimated their adversary: the American people, and Trump as proxy.

Trump does not give up because Trump does not lose.

The Game

Who gives up playing in the middle of a game? A loser.

What is Trump? A fighter. (And a winner.)

The election is a game that is still being played. Trump cannot be bought, intimidated or shamed into concession, despite the media’s attempts. (Also, the media does not matter.) He is not spineless Bernie. He is resilient.

The Deep State candidate could not win the election legitimately, and it does not want to give Trump a second term. The Deep State plays dirty because the Deep State is arrogant and owns the mainstream media. 

But Truth is humbling....

The causalities of this war are journalistic and political integrity and the precious American intellect. When power is at stake, everything is expendable.

"The New Civil War"

Some pundits stoke fear of a Civil war citing the ideological divide among our nation’s people…but ordinary people are a long way off from fighting one another in a Civil War. What would they fight over? ‘Systemic racism?’ ‘Trans Rights?’ ‘Police Brutality?’ Culture War is not the same as Civil War.

All Democrats can do is put the inevitable on pause: their election loss, the resurgent American economy, the triumphant return to tradition…

…the inevitable violence after the truth of the hand counted votes trickles out….

If CNN gives the command to ‘cut down the tall trees’ or ‘crush the cockroaches,’ who’s to say the useful idiots in my neighborhood wouldn’t heed the call? Who would dare wear a MAGA hat in a 10:1 Democrat neighborhood? Where can their aggression be focused? Innocent storefronts? 

Normal people don’t want to fight or riot. They want to be civilized, even if an election is not in their favor. It is the abnormal people to be wary of…the abnormal people radicalized by the media…

Who stands up for the normal people? (Even those that hate him?) Who never gives up? More importantly, who is our real adversary? 

Hint: Rhymes with Schmina...

I am an Election Worker

I worked the census and now I'm working the election and the government is Awesome. 

We take the government for granted. It's really not fair. The government doesn't have to exist. Just look at Somalia! Conversely, the government does not have to give us our right to criticize it. Just look at China! It does not have to be so nice.

Our government is so massive and so powerful. Some people are sexually attracted to individuals with power and I don't understand why. Is it because you can possibly have sex with someone who has power? Who cares?! Sex is overrated, like money. People think they have power because they have some capacity to make decisions for a short amount of time. It's laughable. Real power is all that matters. Power is Awesome. Just look at God! 

It's also definitely not gay to have a crush on the government. But I'm getting off topic again. That's not today's topic....

My favorite scapegoat, the news media, makes an excellent living selling fear. The legacy media says there is no fraud to worry about (unlike their claims of "Russian hacking" from 2016) and the underground social media says that there is potential for a coup if either candidate wins the election. Underground Social Media (USM) continue to break stories of fraud, finding ballots marked 'Trump' in a dumpster. Fear is exciting, so I bought into the 'Civil Unrest' hype because it is only going to be 2020 for a few more months. Time flies!

Only a tiny fraction of a fraction of idiots believe that violence is necessary for change to occur. (And the government gives them their freedom to believe that! How nice is that?!) The vaster majority of people disagree. They know that we must remain civilized at all costs, and that being civilized means being patient. They also realize that they can effect change on Election Day. Every. Year. 

Our government has given us the chance to change it every year since we've become a nation. It does not matter who gets elected so much as it matters that there is always an election, and there will always be an election. There will also always forces of evil that are trying to manipulate the outcome of our awesome free elections, whether it be the mafia, Somali immigrants, Russia, China, or the Deep State. 

The Board of Elections knows this. They are awesome. They know that we are "vulnerable." They live for preserving the integrity of every election because it is the DNA of our nation's tradition. And they aren't stupid like people scoff. People are just jealous they aren't as massive or organized. (Being a free government is hard! Cut them some slack!) 

Government bureaucracy, normally a punchline, is our most effective weapon against any potential threats to undermine our free elections. Every aspect of the voting process is secured to the point where poll workers cannot tamper with ballots if they wanted to! Each voting site is managed by a BOE coordinators, invisible heroes of integrity. Assuming they form a network of apostates to rig the election is ludicrous because time is finite and their workload for such an immense undertaking would increase 100 fold. Humanly impossible. They report to a higher manager anyway, who would also have to turned apostate and form a shadow organization for this scheme to work, and on and on up the chain, which stretches beyond any of their sights. The BOE is distinct from other agencies, and has multiple branches within itself. (The mafia was based on such a design.) For integrity sake no one person knows more than they need to do their very specific job. 

This is not Africa. To organize some kind resistance to cast fake presidential ballots would require a rival organization the size and scope of a government. The clandestine Deep State cannot even measure up. They are too small, and the BOE has too much security in the form of other government organizations, like FBI and the NYPD. Honestly, the 'Deep State' feels more like media fear mongering than legitimate threat. 

Trust me, if our government on its whole wanted to crush its people it can. Just look at China. We should be very grateful that they don't, while still criticizing them wherever necessary. 

I'll be sure to post my Election Day diary.

Have Hope! It is more exciting than fear! It is going to be 2021 in a few months.